Interreg France Suisse web site
MetalPAT-Interreg About Scientific bases Learn Search tools Sign In
  • The object
  • Description and visual observation
    • Study area(s)
    • Binocular observation and representation of the corrosion structure
    • MiCorr stratigraphy(ies) – Bi
  • Sample(s)
  • Analyses and results
    • Non invasive analysis
    • Metal
    • Corrosion layers
    • MiCorr stratigraphy(ies) – CS
  • Synthesis of the binocular / cross-section examination of the corrosion structure
  • Conclusion
  • References
×

Axe head N11 - Tin Bronze - Middle Bronze Age

Axe head N11 - Tin Bronze - Middle Bronze Age

Axe head N11

Christian. Degrigny (HE-Arc CR, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) & Valentin. Boissonnas (HE-Arc CR, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland)

Contact the author Share Print
/artefacts/335/
The object
Credit HE-Arc CR_E.Forster.

Fig. 1: Bronze axe head n°11,

Description and visual observation

Bronze axe head covered with a brown patina (Fig. 1). A uniform darker green corrosion product as well as a green powdery corrosion product appear locally in some areas. Dimensions: L = 90 mm; W max = 40 mm ; WT = 154.32 g.

Tool

Unknown

Date unknown

Middle Bronze Age

Bronze Age

Soil

Neues Museum, Biel/Bienne

Neues Museum, Biel/Bienne

N11

No information, the object might have been treated in the past.

Complementary information

Nothing to report.

Study area(s)
Credit HE-Arc CR, E.Forster.

Fig. 2: General view of the axe head showing the location of Fig. 4 (sample 1),

Credit HE-Arc CR, E.Forster.

Fig 3: Side view of the axe head showing the location of Fig. 5 (sample 2), Fig. 6 (sample 3) and Fig. 7 (sample 4),

Credit HE-Arc CR, E.Forster.

Fig 4: Local corrosion (diameter: 2 mm) where sample 1 has been taken,

Credit HE-Arc CR, E.Forster.

Fig. 5: Local corrosion (length max: 30 mm) where sample 2 has been taken,

Credit HE-Arc CR, E.Forster.

Fig. 6: Local corrosion (length max: 10 mm) where sample 3 has been taken,

Credit HE-Arc CR, E.Forster.

Fig 7: Green dark corrosion layer where sample 4 has been taken,

Binocular observation and representation of the corrosion structure

The schematic representation below gives an overview of the corrosion layers encountered on the head axe from a first visual macroscopic observation.

Credit HE-Arc CR, E.Foster.

Fig. 8: Stratigraphic representation of corrosion products of the axe head (based on visual observations),

MiCorr stratigraphy(ies) – Bi
Sample(s)
Credit HE-Arc CR, E.Foster.

Fig. 9: Location of the samples on the stratigraphic representation of Fig. 8,

Particles were sampled (Figs. 4-7 and Fig. 9) with a scalpel from the areas where local corrosion has developed.

Tin Bronze

Unknown

-----

HE-Arc CR, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel

HE-Arc CR, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel

March 04, 2013, chemical and structural analysis

Complementary information

Nothing to report.

Analyses and results

Analyses performed: 
SEM-EDS, FTIR.

The FTIR device used is a Biorad Excalibur FTS 3000 spectrometer coupled to an IR microscope UMA500. The measurements were performed between 4000 and 650 cm-1.

Non invasive analysis

Metal

SEM/EDS analysis of corroded particles indicates that the alloy is composed of copper (Cu) and tin (Sn) with some arsenic (As). The core metal is most likely a tin bronze.

?

Cu

As, Sn

Complementary information

Nothing to report.

Corrosion layers

Analyses by SEM/EDS indicate that the light yellow particles of sample 1 are predominantly composed of Sn and O with minor presence of C, Cu, Fe, S, Cl and As (Fig. 12), while the green and red particles of sample 2 are respectively composed of O, Cu, Cl, and Sn, with a minor presence of Fe and S (Fig. 13) and Cu, O (Fig. 14, possibly cuprite). Sample 3 consists of green particles composed mostly of Sn, Cl, Cu and O with S, Al and Fe as minor elements (Fig. 15). Sample 4 is constituted of green and white particles. The former have the same composition as the particles of sample 3 while the white particles are significantly different in composition: containing a large amount of C with a small amount of O, Cl, S, K and Cu (Fig. 16). The FTIR spectrum of the white particles (Fig. 17) shows several characteristic peaks of an organic compound: 2919 cm-1 and 2850 cm-1 (C-H- bond), 3445 cm-1 and 3323 cm-1 (O-H- bond) or 1030cm-1, 1006cm-1 and 951cm-1 (C-O-C- bond). 

Table 1: Identification of chemical elements in the corrosion products on the head axe. Method of analysis: SEM/EDS, HEI-Arc.

 

Sample / particles

Major elements

Minor elements

Green powdery corrosion product

Sample 1

Sn + O

C + Cu + Fe + S + Cl + As

Sample 2 – CP1c (Fig. 10) - Green particles

O + Cu + Cl + Sn

Fe + S

Sample 2 – CP2 (Fig.10) - Red-brown particles

Cu + O

 

Sample 3 - CP1c (Fig. 10)

Sn + Cl+ Cu + O

S + Al + Fe

Darker green corrosion product

Sample 4 – CP1a (Fig. 11) - Green particles

Cl + Sn + Cu + O

S + C

Sample 4 – CP1a (Fig. 11) - White particles

C

O + Cl + S + K + Cu

 

Credit HEI Arc, S.Ramseyer.

Fig, 12: EDS spectrum of sample 1 (yellow powder),

Credit HEI Arc, S.Ramseyer.

Fig. 13: EDS spectrum of sample 2 (green particle),

Credit HEI Arc, S.Ramseyer.

Fig. 14: EDS spectrum of sample 2 (red particle),

Credit HEI Arc, S.Ramseyer.

Fig. 15: EDS spectrum of sample 3 (green corrosion product),

Credit HEI Arc, S.Ramseyer.

Fig. 16: EDS spectrum of sample 4 (white particle),

Credit Lab of Swiss National Museum, Affoltern am Albis.

Fig. 17: FTIR spectrum of sample 4 (white particle),

Multiform - pitting

None

Complementary information

Nothing to report.

MiCorr stratigraphy(ies) – CS
Fig. 10: Stratigraphic representation of the object in cross-section using the MiCorr application. This presentation can be compared to Fig. 18. CP1 corresponds to CP1c.
Fig. 11: Stratigraphic representation. of the object in cross-section using the MiCorr application. This presentation can be compared to Fig. 18. CP1 corresponds to CP1a.
Synthesis of the binocular / cross-section examination of the corrosion structure

The schematic representation of corrosion layers below integrates additional information based on the analyses carried out.

Credit

Fig. 18: Complementary stratigraphic representation of a virtual cross-section through the axe head based on visual observations and additional analyses with indication of stratigraphies of Figs. 10 and 11.

Conclusion

The axe head is probably a tin bronze containing a small amount of As. It is difficult to interpret the corrosion layer only by macroscopic observation. The analyses show that all green corrosion products contain chlorides that might originate from strip-cleaning by hydrochloric acid (although not documented). Active corrosion is not proved but we suspect the presence of atacamite, paratacamite or clinoatacamite (Cu2Cl(OH)3). FTIR revealed the presence of an organic compound on the metal surface (possibly a protective coating).

References

 

References on analytic methods and interpretation

1.     Bertholon, Régis. La limite de la surface d’origine des objets métalliques archéologiques. Caractérisation, localisation et approche des mécanismes de conservation. ©Régis Bertholon, Paris, 2000.

2.   Degrigny, Christian and Senn, Marianne. Methodology to study and analyse the microstructures and corrosion forms of ancient and historic metals: application to metallographic samples from Swiss collections MIFAC-Métal. Projet Sagex, Final Report, Haute école de conservation-restauration ARC, Neuchâtel, 2012.

3.     Selwyn, Lyndsie. Métaux et corrosion Un manuel pour le professionnel de la conservation. Institut Canadien de Conservation, Ottawa, 2004.

Interreg France Suisse web site
Contact | Privacy | Impressum | v5.0-117-g4d6dd07

This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Institut de Recherche sur les ArchéoMATériaux web site Laboratoire archéomatériaux et prévision de l'altération web site Haute Ecole Arc web site