Sacrificial knife (tumi) - Cu Alloy - Peru

Christian. Degrigny (HE-Arc CR, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) & Marion. Billot (HE-Arc CR, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) & Valentin. Boissonnas (HE-Arc CR, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland)

Complementary information

Little information on the origin of the artifact. Most likely not documented before being donated to the museum.    

The schematic representation below gives an overview of the corrosion layers encountered on the tumi from a first visual macroscopic observation under binocular microscope.

Fig. 6. Stratigraphic representation of the tumi in cross-section using the MiCorr application, credit MiCorr_HE-Arc CR, M.Billot.

X-ray radiography[1], XRF[2], SEM-EDS, and XRD.

Conditions of the XRD analysis: Stoe Mark II-Imaging Plate Diffractometer System (Stoe & Cie, 2015) equipped with a graphite-monochromator. Data collection was performed using Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073Å, beam diameter 0.5mm). Two-dimensional diffraction images (10min. per exposure) were obtained at an image plate distance of 200mm with a continued sample rotation. The resolution was Dmin - Dmax 24.00 - 1.04Å and intensity integration has been performed over the entire image (360°).


[1] The conditions are unknown.

[2] On the object with portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (NITON XL3t 950 Air GOLDD+ analyser, Thermo Fischer®.

The metal is an arsenical copper alloy with low concentration of iron and traces of silver (Table 1).

XRF analyses have been conducted on eight areas, on the two sides of the non-cleaned artifact. Almost all analyses are the same except for the area “e” (Fig. 2, Table 1) where a slightly higher concentration of arsenic was measured.

Elements mass%

Cu

As

Ag

Fe

Cl

Al

Si

K

P

Ca

S

BAL

a

61.9

0.5

0.05

0.4

0.3

3.6

12.6

0.7

0.2

1.1

0.2

18.3

b

51.9

0.3

0.04

0.4

0.3

1.4

11.9

0.7

0.07

0.8

0.1

31.8

c

51.4

0.3

0.04

0.5

0.3

2.5

14.4

0.8

0.1

0.9

0.1

28.2

d

52.7

0.3

0.04

0.5

0.4

2.6

16.6

0.8

0.06

1.1

0.2

24.5

e

39.8

1.1

0.03

0.9

2.2

3.1

13.6

0.8

0.07

1.0

0.4

36.7

f

52.6

0.3

0.03

0.3

0.2

1.8

11.7

0.7

0.04

1.5

0.4

30.3

g

52.5

0.3

0.04

0.3

0.3

2.1

11.5

0.6

0.2

1.6

0.3

30.1

h

38.4

0.2

0.03

0.8

0.1

3.0

16.5

0.8

0.1

0.9

0.2

38.8

Table 1: Chemical composition of the non-cleaned metal surface. Method of analysis: XRF. Mining mode Cu/Zn, acquisition time 180s (filters: M30/Lo30/H60/Li60), in the support. BAL corresponds to the elements not analysed: O and C. The exogenous elements are indicated in light-yellow while remarkable concentrations are highlighted in yellow, credit MiCorr_HE-Arc CR, C.Degrigny.

Complementary information

Complementary information given by X-radiography (Fig. 7) shows that the object is not totally mineralized and still has a lot of remaining metal. Irregularities and different thicknesses are visible and parallel lines show that the artifact was hammered. The whiter the area, the thicker the metal is.

Results from XRF analysis of the non-cleaned metal surface (Table 1) indicate an elevated concentration of chlorine.

The exogenous elements come from the landfill are mainly Si and Al, certainly associated to aluminosilicates.    

A sample was taken in the powdered light-green isolated layer (Figs. 2, 4 and 5). Chlorine, copper and oxygen was analysed by SEM-EDS. The presence of high concentration of Cl as well as Cu and O seems to indicate active corrosion (Fig. 8). XRD analysis confirmed the presence of paratacamite often associated to active corrosion (Fig. 9).

Based on the analysis carried out, the schematic representation of the stratigraphy of corrosion layers (Fig. 5) was corrected. The limit of the original surface (represented by the dotted line on the figure below) was identified as still present and is located at the interface between CP6 and CP7.

This tumi is an arsenic copper alloy with a low percentage of iron, as well as traces of silver. This alloy was common in pre-Columbian South America[1]. The X-ray radiography shows that this object was formed from a metal sheet and cold hammered.

Chlorine is found locally in the form of paratacamite.

The limit of the original surface has been altered by the corrosion products but can be found at the interface of CP6 and CP7. This tumi follows the type II corrosion model of L. Robbiola.


[1] Pillsbury, 2001, p. 97.

 

References object

1. Pillsbury, J. Moche art and archeology in ancient Peru. National Gallery of Art, Washington, 2001. 

References on analytic methods and interpretation 

2. Scott, D. Copper and Bronze in Art: Corrosion, Colorants, Conservation. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 2002.

3. Robbiola, L. Caracterisation de l'altération de bronzes archéologiques enfouis à partir d'un corpus d'objets de l'âge du bronze. Mécanismes de corrosion. Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, 1990.