Chisel point DEV 995 1069 PR
Marianne. Senn (EMPA, Dübendorf, Zurich, Switzerland) & Christian. Degrigny (HE-Arc CR, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland)
The rectangular section of a massive moil chisel fragment with an incomplete tip and missing shaft (Fig. 1). Dimensions: L = 3.7cm; WT = 16g.
Tool
Settlement Develier, Courtételle, Jura, Switzerland
Excavated in 1995, farm 2 and workshop area 1
Early medieval times
Soil
Office de la Culture, Porrentruy, Jura
Office de la Culture, Porrentruy, Jura
DEV 995/1069 PR
Conserved between 1995 and 2000: desiccation at 80°C, mechanical cleaning, passivation with tannic acid and surface protection with Paraloid B72® (Eschenlohr et al. 2007, 75).
Nothing to report.
Stratigraphic representation: none.
A longitudinal cut from a chisel point (Figs. 2 and 3) undertaken after restoration. Dimensions: L = 30mm; W = 11mm (approximately).
Eutectoid to hypereutectoid steel
Quench hardened
DEV1069
Empa (Marianne Senn)
Office de la Culture, Porrentruy, Jura
2000, metallography and chemical composition of the metal
Nothing to report.
Analyses performed:
Metallography (nital etched), Vickers hardness testing, LA-ICP-MS, SEM/EDX.
The remaining metal is a eutectoid to hypereutectoid steel (C 0.8-1 mass%) with cracks and porosity (Figs. 5 and 6). Its composition is given in Table 1 (except Fe). Of the trace elements, only Ni reaches a medium concentration (Ni 0.07 mass%). The composition and the high Ni/Co ratio are atypical for iron worked in smithies of the settlement at Develier-Courtételle JU, CH. The few slag inclusions and their chemical composition confirm this (Table 2). The slag is rich in CaO whereas the pisolithic or bean ore worked in the Central Jura smelting district is rich in Al2O3. The slag inclusions cannot be smithing slag because the artefact is formed from one piece of metal. The slag probably incorporated while refining the bloom or during the bloom smelting process. The ore from which this metal was smelted cannot yet be identified. Intergranular corrosion has developed, penetrating into the metal structure (Fig. 6). The etched metal shows a dominant martensitic structure, typical of quench hardened steel (Figs. 5, 7, 8 and 9). The characteristic forms of the martensite are non-organised needles (Fig. 8). In restricted areas bainite nodules occur (Figs. 7 and 8). In the centre of the point, hypereutectoid steel is composed of cementite in the grain boundaries and in needle like shapes within the grains (Fig. 10). Hypereutectoid regions also occur in the centre of the shaft and on its left surface (Fig. 5). Here the hypereutectoid steel is composed of martensite and cementite in the grain boundaries and in needle form within the grains (Figs. 6 and 9). Nevertheless, most of the chisel is dominated by eutectoid steel. The average hardness of the quench hardened eutectoid steel is about HV1 690. In the bainite nodules the average hardness drops to about HV1 350, the martensite has an average hardness of HV1 750.
Elements | V | Cr | Mn | P | Co | Ni | Cu | As | Ag | Ni/Co | C* mass% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median mg/kg | 2 | 20 | 2 | 300 | 40 | 680 | 100 | 190 | < | 17 | 0.8-1 |
Detection limit mg/kg | 1 | 8 | 1 | 70 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.2 | 1 | 6 |
RSD % | 50 | 36 | 15 | 21 | 5 | 13 | 55 | 10 | - |
*visually estimated
Table 1: Chemical composition of the metal. Method of analysis: LA-ICP-MS, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Empa (for details see Devos et al. 2000).
Structure | Location | Na2O | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | K2O | CaO | TiO2 | FeO | Total |
SiO2/Al2O3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glass and? | Tip | 0.6 | 2.4 | 7.8 | 50 | 3.9 | 15 | < | 20 | 100 | 6.4 |
Glass and? | Tip | 0.6 | 2.5 | 8.9 | 65 | 4.7 | 18 | 0.7 | 4.2 | 104 | 7.3 |
Glass with needles | Middle | 0.7 | 2.6 | 10 | 59 | 4.6 | 21 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 101 | 5.9 |
Glass with needles | Middle | 0.7 | 2.5 | 8.7 | 58 | 4.7 | 21 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 100 | 6.7 |
Glass with needles | Middle | 0.8 | 2.3 | 8.5 | 51 | 4.1 | 24 | 0.7 | 3.6 | 95 | 6.0 |
Table 2: Chemical composition of the slag inclusions (mass%). Method of analysis: SEM/EDS, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Empa.
Martensitic structure (non organised needles) + bainite nodules
Fe
C
Nothing to report.
The metal is heavily corroded and the thickness of the corrosion crust is irregular, but averages about 0.5mm. The corrosion products enclose different ghost structures: the corrosion crust has preserved the shape of polygonal grains (Figs. 11 and 13) and cementite needles (Fig. 12). Under polarised light, the corrosion products at the metal - corrosion crust interface are dark-red and form an inner S-rich layer (CP3, Figs. 11 and 13). Cl occurs locally (CP3) and C is present in layers CP2 and CP3 (Fig. 13). The outer layer of the corrosion products (CP1) is orange and contains more O than the inner layer CP3 (Figs. 11 and 14).
Elements |
O | S | Cl | Fe | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inner red/light-grey layer (CP3) | 27 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 72 | 103 |
Inner dark-red layer (average of 2 similar analyses) (CP2) | 31 | 0.9 | < | 66 | 99 |
Inner orange grain zone | 36 | < | < | 63 | 101 |
Outer orange sub-layer (average of 2 similar analyses) (CP1) | 35 | < | < | 63 | 98 |
Table 3: Chemical composition (mass %) of the corrosion crust (from Figs. 11-14). Method of analysis: SEM/EDS, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Empa.
Fig. 11: Micrograph showing the metal - corrosion crust interface from Fig. 3 (rotated by 270°, detail) and corresponding to the stratigraphy of Fig. 4, unetched, polarised light. Polygonal grains are visible as ghost structure in the corrosion crust. The selected areas for elemental chemical distribution (Figs. 13 and 14) are marked by two rectangles (bottom: Fig. 13 and top: Fig. 14),
Uniform - intergranular
?
Nothing to report.
Corrected stratigraphic representation: none.
The tool is made of hard, eutectoid to hypereutectoid steel and was, as a last manufacturing step, entirely quenched. In this state it is too hard and brittle to be used. It is likely that the quenched hypereutectoid structure provoked the breakage of the tool when it was first used. The absence of a tempering process at the end is unclear. The chemical composition of the metal and the slag inclusions indicate that the artefact was imported to the hamlet of Develier-Courtételle JU. The corrosion has, in areas, replaced the metal structure retaining a ghost structure; the outer layer has been mostly removed during surface cleaning. Extensive pitting corrosion has occurred, typical for steel with an elevated C content. The presence of S in the inner layer can be explained by putrefaction processes in the soil. Chlorides are still present at the metal-corrosion interface as no desalination process was attempted. Iron carbonates are present in the centre of a corrosion pit. The corrosion is of terrestrial type.
References on object and sample |
References object References sample |
References on analytic methods and interpretation |
|